|
Worldwide System for
Conformity Testing
and Certification of Electrotechnical Equipment and Components (IECEE)
CB Scheme |
|
|
||
NCB |
TMP Acceptance |
WMT Acceptance |
SMT |
RMT Acceptance |
If NO, Comments on | |||||
| YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | -
SMT (1) - TMP (2) - WMT (3) - RMT (4) |
||
Argentina |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
Australia |
X | X | X | X(4) | (4): No assurance that NCB assessors have required level of competence to assess capability of MTL. Propose that OD-CB2032 includes parameters for the qualification/recognition of NCB/CBTL assessors performing assessments. |
|||||
Austria |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
Belgium |
X | X | X | X* | ||||||
Brazil |
X | X | X(1) | X | (1): As
in mandatory certification witness is required, SMT can be a problem |
|||||
| X(2) | X(3) |
X(1) | X(4) | (1-4): According to Brazilian regulations all tests need to be performed using an ILAC member testing Laboratory |
||||||
Canada |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
China |
X | X | X(1) | X(4) | ||||||
Czech
Republic |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
Denmark |
X | X | X | X(4) | (4): UL Demko reserves the right to ask for - and receive the assessment report. |
|||||
Finland |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
France |
X | X | X | X(4) | (4): Yes, subject to initial and re-assessment RMT reports being made available to NCBs |
|||||
NCB |
TMP Acceptance |
WMT Acceptance |
SMT |
RMT Acceptance |
If
NO, Comments on |
|||||
| YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | -
SMT (1) - TMP (2) - WMT (3) - RMT (4) |
||
Germany |
X(1) | X | X | X | ||||||
| X1) | X | X | X | |||||||
| X(1) | X | X | X | |||||||
| X | X | X(1) | X(4) | |||||||
| X(1) | X | X | X | |||||||
| X(1) | X | X | X | |||||||
Greece |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
Hungary |
X | X | X | X | India |
X(2) | X(3) | X(1) | X(4) | (1),
(2), (3): Apprehensions about diluted standards & misuse (4): Apprehensions about diluted standards & misuse |
Ireland |
- | - | - | - | - | - | X* | |||
Israel |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
Italy |
X | X | X | X(4) | (4): IMQ negative position is based on the fact that RMT procedure implies in principle a wide acceptance of "first party" conformity assessment results. |
|||||
Japan |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
Korea,
Rep. of |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
| X | X | X | X(4) | (4): because of legal requirements |
||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
Malaysia |
X(2) | X(3) | X(1) | X* | (1): Requirements
for equipment is not satisfactory: Preferably, the requirements for
equipment are fully equipped to product category / standard (similar with CBTL). (2): The requirement for relationship between NCB and the manufacturer is under consideration in OD-CB 2027. It means that the agreement between NCB and manufacturer specified in clause 9 of OD-CB2030 may be subject to change. (3): Comment: Relationship between NCB and manufacturer. What is the limitation? The manufacturer can have agreements with several NCB’s. However, the product categories / standards covered in each agreement should be different. |
|||||
NCB |
TMP Acceptance |
WMT Acceptance |
SMT |
RMT Acceptance |
If
NO, Comments on |
|||||
| YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | -
SMT (1) - TMP (2) - WMT (3) - RMT (4) |
||
Netherlands |
X | X | X | X(4) | (4): Kema will also have proposals towards the RMT procedure. |
|||||
Norway |
X | X | X | X(4) | 4):It is doubted that RMT is within the concept of 3rd party testing |
|||||
Poland |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
| X | X | X | X(4) | (4): In our opinion the testing carried out by independent (3rd party) laboratory is necessary for certification- or full testing in 3rd party's lab or in the systems: SMT, TMP, WMT. System of recognizing the manufacturer's laboratory puts on NCB's too much additional work, obligations, costs and responsibility. |
||||||
Portugal |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
Russian
Federation |
X | X(3) | X(1) | X | (1): GOST
Re accepts in special cases CBTCs/CBTRs based on SMT procedure provided
by Body A under condition of mutual agreements taking into account
requirements additional to CB Scheme technical requirements. (3): GOST Re does not accept CBTCs/CBTRs based on a WMT procedure provided by Body A. |
|||||
Serbia |
X | X | X | X(4) | (4): Kvalitet may request Certificate of Accreditation and RMT Assessment Report of manufacturer laboratory |
|||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
Singapore |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
Slovakia |
X | X | X(1) | X* | (1):
CB Test should be signed by recognized CBTL. |
|||||
Slovenia |
X | X | X | X(4) | (4): It is not likely that our accreditation body would accept RMT procedure as appropriate. |
|||||
South
Africa |
X(2) | X(3) | X(1) | X(4) | (1),
(2), (3): Only 3rd party test results accepted (4): Only 3rd party labs accepted by the regulator. |
|||||
Spain |
X | X | X | X(4) | (4): The RMT procedure endangers the concept of third party certification |
|||||
Sweden |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
Switzerland |
X | X | X | X(4) | (4): Electrosuisse reserves the right to request and receive the most recent MTL Assessment Report carried out by the NCB issuing the CBTR & CBTC |
|||||
|
||||||||||
NCB |
TMP Acceptance |
WMT Acceptance |
SMT |
RMT Acceptance |
If
NO, Comments on |
|||||
| YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | YES | NO | -
SMT (1) - TMP (2) - WMT (3) - RMT (4) |
||
Thailand |
X | X | X | |||||||
Turkey |
X | X | X | X(4) | (4): It will not included quality system yet, preparation of new QM documents implementation postponed till the 3rd quarter of 2009 |
|||||
Ukraine |
X(2) | X(3) | X(1) | X | (1),
(2), (3): Because
manufacturers' testing laboratories are not assessed by Peer Assessors
as CBTL, Recognition is possible only for Big weight and dimension
test. |
|||||
United
Kingdom |
X | X | X | X | ||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
| TRL | X | X | X | X | ||||||
USA |
X(2) | X(3) | X(1) | X(4) | (1),
(2), (3), (4): UL Inc. reserves the right to request and receive the most recent MTL Assessment Report carried out by the NCB issuing the CBTR & CBTC. |
|||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
| X | X | X | X | |||||||
| X | X | X | X* | |||||||
|